H. Casanova
To Win
J. E. Schiessl
To Win
Francesco Forti vs Joao Eduardo Schiessl Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W W L L W L
Form
W L W L L L W L L WHead-To-Head: Forti 1 - 0 Schiessl
They have played 2 sets in total, with Forti winning 2 and Schiessl winning 0. The last match between Forti and Schiessl was at the M15 Chieti, 10-06-2024, First, Clay with Francesco Forti getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Francesco Forti | 1 |
| Joao Eduardo Schiessl | 0 |
M15 Chieti(10-06-2024)
6
3
6
4
| Forti | Stats | Schiessl |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (5-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (6-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 678 | Ranking | 536 |
| 303 | Highest Rank | 520 |
| 25 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 2 |
| 57% (220-165) | Career Total W/L | 56% (102-80) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
28 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Francesco Forti
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:29:0 | Average Match Time | 1:29:0 |
| 57% (30/53) | 1st Serve % | 67% (43/64) |
| 83% (25/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (24/43) |
| 57% (13/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (12/21) |
| 30% (3/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 44% (28/64) | Return Points Win % | 28% (15/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Francesco Forti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Francesco Forti
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Francesco Forti
41%
(
14 of
34)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
50
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Mariano Tammaro
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Beraldo
Player
Francesco Forti
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
63%
(
15 of
24)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
12 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Francesco Forti
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Joao Eduardo Schiessl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Igor Gimenez
75%
(
72 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lautaro Midon
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Antonio Nunez
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yi Zhou
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Anthony Genov
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
13 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
35
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Santiago De La Fuente
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (220/165) | Win/Loss | 56% (102/80) |
| 55% (483/397) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (239/185) |
| 52% (4378/4018) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2095/1899) |
| 64% (48/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (15/15) |
| 56% (146/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (87/65) |
| 54% (26/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1698 | Aces Total | 243 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1093 | Total Double Faults | 295 |
| 1:34:15 | Average Match Time | 1:27:25 |
| 483.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.88 |
| 61% (14816/24489) | 1st Serve % | 66% (6670/10078) |
| 70% (10393/14816) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4282/6670) |
| 50% (4854/9672) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1651/3408) |
| 42% (969/2294) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (470/1018) |
| 39% (9450/24184) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4081/9877) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (74/70) | Challenger W/L | 37% (7/12) |
| 61% (146/92) | Futures W/L | 58% (95/68) |
| 57% (215/378) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (102/182) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (56/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (24/41) |
| 59% (67/113) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (25/60) |
| 88% (206/182) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (98/86) |
| 12% (206/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (98/12) |
| 21% (179/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (84/16) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
